After being disappointed with the direction in which macOS is heading, especially the continuous push into iCloud features that I refuse to use, I decided to say good-bye to macOS and try elementary.os.
After testing it on a separate desktop computer for a couple of months I finally installed it on my MacBook. In this post I am documenting my experience for those who might be interested in switching as well.
No, interactive graphics are not dead.
It is also not true that “85% of the Times‘ page visitors online simply ignore interactive infographics altogether“.
But since I sort of helped creating this confusion, I think it’s time to set this straight:
Interactive graphics are still great, and there are a lot of good reasons to make them!
When working on choropleth maps or charts in Illustrator, sometimes the (final) data is not yet available by the time you’re designing the graphic.
The typical work-around is to re-import the updated part of the graphic and align it with the rest of the artwork. But this is tedious work, especially if you’re dealing with multiple maps.
To address this problem I wrote an Illustrator script that can re-color the artwork based on a JSON file. This blog post will walk you through how to use the script.
There has been some debate about the jittery gauge chart we used in our live election forecast. Rather than replying to dozens of tweets I decided to wrap this up in an old-fashioned blog post™. Feel free to add your thoughts to the comments.
Great Britain has voted to leave the E.U., and election result cartograms are all over the internet. However, for our map we decided to stick with a simple map instead.
tl;dr: Here’s a demo with source code.
D3 is nice, but it also makes some simple things look really complicated. One of them is making a simple HTML table. Let’s say you got a simple dataset, stored as array of objects just as you would get from d3.csv:
This is a transcript of my lightning talk at NICAR 2015 yesterday.
Please give the animated GIFs some time to load :)
Charting tools are great.
They let us create charts and visualizations without writing code, and in a fraction of the time it would take to do in tools like Adobe Illustrator.
I want to see the features! →
It’s ok to use word clouds if your goal is to encourage reading of a large set of otherwise unrelated words that are connected to one or two interesting values (and word count in a text doesn’t qualify as interesting).
This I tweeted yesterday and now I feel that if I encourage the (dangerous) use of word clouds, I have to explain this exception in a little more detail. Why is it sometimes ok to use a widely rejected visualization method, and most times not?
Using open source tools it is now super easy to make your own map tiles, and with a little extra work you can render them in whatever map projection you want. No more excuses to use Mercator! For example, here is a map we published today at The Upshot. It shows where prime-age women are working more or less then average, and includes data from county-level in the overview map down to every census tract once you zoom in. And all is nicely projected in Albers Equal-Area Conic, a projection widely adopted as standard for U.S. maps.
here’s how you do it
Never trust a statistic that you
haven’t visualized yourself.
It’s election time in Germany and, as usual, there are tons of opinion polls telling us who is going to win the election anyway. It is debatable whether or not pre-election polls are healthy for our democracy in general, but at least everybody agrees that the polls should be kind of neutral. And if they are not, the institutes publishing the polls should be blamed publicly.
But how do we know if an institute publishes ‘biased’ polls? You guessed it: with data. More precisely: with data and the unique power of data visualization.